The story of Ryan Wesley Routh, now known as the suspect in the assassination attempt on Donald Trump at a Florida golf course, is an alarming case study in how unchecked propaganda can twist an individual's reality. In 2022, Routh was interviewed by Newsweek Romania, where he passionately defended his involvement in the Ukraine war, characterizing it as a "battle of good versus evil." This interview sheds light on the tragic path that ultimately led him to attempt an attack on president Trump.
At 58, Routh had been deeply indoctrinated by corporate media’s narrative of the Ukraine war, portraying the conflict as an epic struggle between righteousness and evil. His rhetoric in the interview reveals a man whose understanding of global politics had been reduced to simplistic, black-and-white terms. He wasn’t just a soldier without a cause—he had been turned into a zealot, radicalized by a constant barrage of war propaganda and mainstream talking points that echoed the stance of the corporate and intelligence-backed media.
In the Newsweek Romania interview, Routh’s childlike view of the war is on full display. He explains how he flew from Hawaii to Ukraine because he believed it was his moral duty to support the "good" side of a global struggle. "This is about good versus evil," he claims, likening the conflict to a storybook. He talks about Ukrainians as selfless, compassionate, and virtuous, while casting Russia and its leaders as embodiments of evil incapable of basic moral decency.
Routh’s idealism, though, was a product of manipulation. His words echo corporate media's continuous drumbeat, parroting simplistic tropes about the Ukraine conflict without truly understanding the broader geopolitical complexities. The mainstream media's failure to critically analyze the role of NATO expansion, U.S. foreign policy, and the interests of global elites in the war helped shape Routh’s perception of the situation. It was a narrative that gave him a cause to fight for, even if it was based on a distorted version of reality.
Throughout the interview, Routh emphasizes his disappointment in others for not joining the fight. “We need everyone here fighting,” he says, expressing frustration that the rest of the world wasn’t rallying behind Ukraine. To him, the war was a moral imperative, and those who failed to act were complicit in evil’s victory.
Routh’s belief that he had to save the world by recruiting fighters to Ukraine was not just the product of his own thoughts—it was the direct result of repeated pro-war messaging across corporate and “independent” news outlets. His inability to see the nuances in the conflict was a failure of the media to present a balanced view of global events. And that failure had devastating consequences.
When figures like Donald Trump or Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speak about ending the war, people like Routh view it as a betrayal of what they’ve come to see as a righteous cause. They believe stopping the war equates to siding with evil, and thus, radical action—like an assassination attempt—becomes, in their mind, a morally justifiable response.
The Role of Corporate Media in Routh’s Radicalization
Routh’s case raises a critical question: where was he radicalized? The corporate media won’t ask this, because the answer is too uncomfortable. Routh wasn’t radicalized in an underground forum or by some fringe extremist group. He was radicalized by the very media outlets that claim to speak truth to power.
The endless parade of talking heads, CIA-backed narratives, and oversimplified reporting on the Ukraine war had a profound effect on Routh’s psyche. He consumed these stories, internalized them, and they eventually drove him to the conclusion that violence was necessary to prevent Trump—a figure who opposed the continuation of the Ukraine war—from returning to power.
This is the same media apparatus that pushed the Russiagate narrative for years, helping lay the groundwork for widespread anti-Russian sentiment. This demonization of Russia, amplified by both corporate media and allegedly independent outlets, created a climate where people like Routh could be easily convinced that their moral duty was to fight, no matter the cost.
Propaganda and the War on Truth
Routh’s story is not unique. He is just one of many individuals who have been swept up in the tide of war propaganda, manipulated by a media machine that profits from conflict and chaos. What’s most disturbing is that the very voices responsible for his radicalization won’t take accountability. They won’t acknowledge that their pro-war rhetoric has pushed people to dangerous extremes.
Instead, they will continue to push their narratives unchallenged, leaving more people vulnerable to the same kind of manipulation that turned Ryan Routh from a fervent supporter of Ukraine into a would-be assassin of a former president. Routh's story should be a wake-up call to the dangers of uncritical consumption of media, particularly when it comes to issues of war and peace.
Ryan Routh’s journey from Ukraine zealot to Trump assassination suspect is a stark reminder of the power of propaganda. His belief that the war in Ukraine was a simple battle of good versus evil, coupled with the media’s failure to present a nuanced view of the conflict, drove him to radical and violent action.
The media's role in Routh's radicalization cannot be ignored. Their constant pro-war drumbeat, their uncritical reporting of intelligence narratives, and their failure to question the deeper issues at play in Ukraine helped shape the mind of a man who now sits in custody for attempting to take the life of Donald Trump.
Routh's case is not an isolated incident—it's the direct result of a media environment that encourages ideological extremism and oversimplification. The question now is whether we will confront this reality or continue to let corporate media manipulate public opinion unchecked.
And yes he donated to the left
Comments