Kamala Harris’s political career is a masterclass in opportunism, marked by a cynical manipulation of racial identity and personal relationships. Her rise to power is a testament to how far she’ll go to secure influence, often at the expense of integrity and authenticity.
Kamala Harris's heritage is complex, yet it’s clear she isn’t the straightforward black identity she often portrays. Her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, is entirely South Asian. Her father, Donald Harris, is biracial. Donald's mother, Beryl Christie, is of Sub-Saharan African descent, while his father, Oscar Joseph Harris, is also biracial. Oscar's lineage includes a British merchant and slave owner, Joseph Alexander Harris, and Christiana Krissie Brown, a biracial Jamaican woman.
Oscar's mother, Christiana, was the daughter of Hamilton Brown Jr., an Irish man, and Mary Malvina, a woman of Sub-Saharan African descent. Hamilton Brown Jr.'s parents were Hamilton Brown, a wealthy Irish slave owner, and Kate Williams, who owned the 2000-acre Menarda Plantation in Jamaica. So, Harris is approximately 50% South Asian, 19% European, 31% African and 100% Political Prostitute.
Despite this mixed heritage, Harris has frequently leveraged a black identity to suit her political ambitions. This strategic shift from emphasizing her South Asian roots to presenting herself as a black woman demonstrates a calculated use of identity politics. It’s a move designed to appeal to various voter demographics, conveniently shifting identities as political winds change.
Kamala Harris’s career trajectory is not just marked by racial manipulation but also by leveraging whore ass to climb the political ladder. Her connections to influential figures like Willie Brown, who facilitated her initial foray into public office, are well-documented. But the whispers in San Francisco go much further.
Staffers and insiders have come forward with allegations that Harris acted as an escort for judges, politicians, and powerful businessmen. These relationships allegedly swayed court cases and helped push leftist policies in the state. The Democrats are working overtime to bury these damning allegations, but the truth is beginning to surface.
As California’s Attorney General, Harris’s record was far from spotless. She was known for her harsh sentencing policies, particularly against young black men for minor drug offenses, which stands in stark contrast to her public persona of advocating for justice reform. Her tenure also saw questionable legal decisions, such as the consolidation and dismissal of thousands of counts against OneWest Bank executives, who were significant contributors to her campaign.
Mainstream media has played a complicit role in Harris’s racial identity charade and the cover-up of her questionable rise to power. By promoting her as a symbol of diversity and progress, they’ve effectively shielded her from scrutiny. The narrative that Kamala Harris is the embodiment of black female empowerment is a convenient, yet misleading, simplification that ignores her complex and opportunistic racial and personal history.
The left’s obsession with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies is exposed when scrutinized through Harris’s career. They celebrate these principles but bristle when someone points out that Harris’s identity politics are a facade. Her identity has been fluid, shifting as needed to appeal to voters and garner sympathy, which should raise alarm bells about her authenticity and integrity.
Kamala Harris’s political success is not merely the result of hard work and dedication but a carefully crafted manipulation of racial identity politics and personal relationships. Her fluctuating self-identification as black or South Asian, depending on what suits her politically, and the allegations of using personal relationships for political gain are stark reminders of the cynical use of identity and power in modern politics. It’s time to see through the facade and question the real motivations behind her rise to power. Stay informed, question the narratives, and join the movement against the manipulation and deceit that define today’s political landscape.
Comments