top of page
Writer's pictureA.Weishaupt

The Great Polling Deception: Why the Numbers Are Skewed


In the twisted world of mainstream media, polling data is the ultimate tool of manipulation. They want you to believe their narrative, but let's break down the reality behind the numbers. Spoiler alert: It's not as grim as they want you to think for Donald Trump.


Polls are presented as gospel, but they’re often a labyrinth of bias and selective sampling. Mainstream outlets skew the methodology to craft a narrative that fits their agenda. Let’s look at some key points to understand this deception:


Over-Sampling Certain Demographics: Many polls disproportionately sample urban, younger, and more progressive demographics. They intentionally under-sample rural and conservative areas, which heavily support Trump. This tactic is designed to present a false picture of overwhelming opposition to Trump.


Misleading Questions: The way questions are phrased can significantly influence responses. Pollsters often use loaded questions to elicit responses that align with a particular viewpoint.


Selective Reporting: Even if a poll shows favorable results for Trump, mainstream media often cherry-pick the least favorable data to highlight. This selective reporting creates a skewed perception of public opinion.


The Real Numbers


When we dig into the raw data, a different picture emerges. Here’s a breakdown of some key battleground states and what the real numbers reveal:


Arizona

Despite the media’s narrative, Trump is leading by a solid margin. Recent likely voter polls have Trump up by an average of 4.2 points. The enthusiasm in Trump rallies in Arizona starkly contrasts with the manufactured data presented by the mainstream media.


Nevada

Trump holds a significant lead here as well, with a margin of 4 points in the latest polls. This is a state where the narrative of Trump’s unpopularity is clearly contradicted by the numbers.


Wisconsin

A tighter race, but still, Trump is up by 2.2 points. Historical data shows that at this point in previous elections, Democrats had a significant lead, which they’ve now lost.


Michigan

The media touts Harris’s lead here, but when you remove the outlier Bloomberg poll (which suspiciously oversampled younger voters and urban areas), Trump is actually in a strong position.


Pennsylvania

Trump leads by an average of 2.7 points in recent polls. This is a state critical for both candidates, and Trump’s rallies there show substantial grassroots support.


North Carolina

With Trump leading by 5.5 points, this state is leaning solidly red. The media’s attempts to portray it as a battleground are increasingly desperate.


Georgia

Trump’s stronghold, with a comfortable lead. Despite the media’s efforts to flip the narrative, Georgia’s support for Trump remains unwavering.


The electoral map, when stripped of bias, reveals a clear path to victory for Trump. By focusing on key battleground states and maintaining strong grassroots support, Trump is poised to secure a win despite the media’s efforts to undermine him.


Pennsylvania: If Trump secures Pennsylvania, which current data suggests he will, it dramatically narrows the path to victory for Harris.


Arizona and Nevada: Holding leads in these states further strengthens Trump’s position, making it increasingly difficult for Harris to reach the necessary electoral votes.


Wisconsin and Michigan: Even if Harris takes Michigan, Trump’s lead in Wisconsin offsets this, maintaining his advantage.


The media’s polling data is a smokescreen designed to demoralize Trump supporters and create a sense of inevitability around Harris’s candidacy. But the real numbers tell a different story. Trump is not only holding strong but is leading in key states that will decide the election.


Stay informed, question the narrative, and look beyond the headlines. The truth is out there, buried under layers of bias and manipulation. The real polling data reveals a nation ready to support Donald Trump and reject the globalist agenda that seeks to undermine American sovereignty and exceptionalism.





Comments


bottom of page